Monday, April 15, 2013

 

U.S. spent $95 billion on duplicate projects in 2012

A report on waste by the US Government Accountability Office shows some $95 billion in duplicate spending last year on anything from safety inspections to research.

The findings suggest that identifying overlaps earlier could have prevented the sequester.

The agency's report for 2013, the third edition since first being requested by Senator Tom Coburn, highlights billions in overlapping and duplicated efforts by government agencies, with the aggregate total now coming in at $295 billion since the reports began.

While government waste has long been a point of contention in the US by Congress and the public alike, with mandatory budget cuts now digging into every agency the notion of such large sums going into unnecessary programs is impossible to ignore.
According to The Washington Examiner, which took a closer look at the tally of GAO recommendations, 85 of the total 300 action items suggested since 2011 have been ignored, while another 149 are currently on a waiting list for implementation.

Though the paper’s reporting points to White House negligence in implementing potential cost-saving measures, it equally wags its finger at Senators and representatives that encourage spending on projects within their states and districts, often anonymously and without floor votes.

Though there have been efforts on the part of Congress to restrict earmarks, or guarantees of federal money going to specific projects or programs, such efforts have received generally mixed results.

For example, a 2012 report produced by Citizens Against Government Waste (CAWG) showed that a US House effort to voluntarily ban earmarks led to a decrease of their use from 9,129 to 152 (or $16.5 billion to $3.3 billion) though at the same time the process became virtually anonymous, and projects required gumshoe investigating prowess to even identify.

The type of overlapping or duplicated government spending accounted for by the GAO could well be reined in at least in part by closer scrutiny of earmarks. CAWG’s 2012 report, for example, found that among the violations on the earmark moratorium was $120 million for research on alternative energy.

Meanwhile, the GAO identified “fragmented” renewable energy initiatives on the part of 23 government agencies.

Fragmentation, as defined by the agency, involves situations in which more than one federal agency or more than one organization within the same agency are essentially conducting the same research.

According to the Examiner, all of the proposals by the GAO presented since 2011 when summed up together could have amounted to a savings that would have avoided the current automatic sequestration cuts being enacted.

Whether those savings are truly realistic to implement is another question, though it seems a fair to ask considering the austerity program currently causing everything from airport control tower shutdowns to decreased coverage for Medicaid cancer patients.
Tags : , , ,

Share

Social

The idea behind the text.
Respect for the truth is almost the basis of all morality.
Nothing can come from nothing.



Follow

Popular Topics

Read

Well, the way they make shows is, they make one show. That show's called a pilot. Then they show that show to the people who make shows, and on the strength of that one show they decide if they're going to make more shows.

Like you, I used to think the world was this great place where everybody lived by the same standards I did, then some kid with a nail showed me I was living in his world, a world where chaos rules not order, a world where righteousness is not rewarded. That's Cesar's world, and if you're not willing to play by his rules, then you're gonna have to pay the price.

You think water moves fast? You should see ice. It moves like it has a mind. Like it knows it killed the world once and got a taste for murder. After the avalanche, it took us a week to climb out. Now, I don't know exactly when we turned on each other, but I know that seven of us survived the slide... and only five made it out. Now we took an oath, that I'm breaking now. We said we'd say it was the snow that killed the other two, but it wasn't. Nature is lethal but it doesn't hold a candle to man.

You see? It's curious. Ted did figure it out - time travel. And when we get back, we gonna tell everyone. How it's possible, how it's done, what the dangers are. But then why fifty years in the future when the spacecraft encounters a black hole does the computer call it an 'unknown entry event'? Why don't they know? If they don't know, that means we never told anyone. And if we never told anyone it means we never made it back. Hence we die down here. Just as a matter of deductive logic.