Sunday, May 5, 2013


It's grads over grandmas in immigration bill

A merit-based system in the proposed immigration overhaul would favor immigrants who can contribute to the U.S. economy over relatives of citizens.

WASHINGTON — Immigration authorities would give preference to better-educated and trained visa seekers who can contribute to the U.S. economy under a less-noticed provision of the immigration bill in the Congress.

The bipartisan bill in the Senate would rewrite the half-century-old standards that control legal immigration to favor skills over family ties.

The winners of this proposed "merit-based" system, experts say, would be primarily from Asia, particularly from India, China and the Philippines, whose citizens are more likely to have attended college or have on-the-job training in skilled occupations such as engineering and technology. The losers are likely to be Mexicans and Central Americans.

The new system, long advocated by economists and politicians who believe the main purpose of immigration laws should be to serve economic growth, would replace one geared mainly to reuniting families.

As an example, an engineering graduate from India would have a better chance of immigrating to the United States than the grandmother of a naturalized U.S. citizen who does not speak English.

The best-known provisions of the Senate bill would provide a path to legal status for about 11 million undocumented immigrants currently living in the United States, reinforce borders to control the flow of future illegal immigrants and establish a new system for temporary "guest workers" to meet the needs of employers seeking lower-skilled workers.

So far, those are the most controversial elements of the bill, which is scheduled for consideration next week in the Senate Judiciary Committee, the first step in a prolonged debate in the Senate and the House of Representatives.

The merit-based approach may provoke a fight as well.

Currently, most foreigners can get a green card — which allows them to stay and work in the United States — only if an immediate family member or company sponsors them. Cubans and refugees are admitted under different programs.

The bill proposed by four Democrats and four Republicans would make it harder for the siblings and adult children of citizens to get permanent residence visas or green cards. The legislation would also eliminate "diversity" green cards, which has helped Africans immigrate to the United States.

But the bill would create another way to get a green card, whereby immigrants would be awarded the most points based on their level of education, employment experience, entrepreneurship in business, English-language proficiency and family ties.

"Our immigration system has been holding us back," said Lanae Erickson Hatalsky, social policy director with the centrist Third Way think tank. "It has not been set up to make economic growth our priority, and this is a huge step in that direction."

Foreigners would be awarded 15 points for a doctoral degree and 10 more points if they had a full-time job in the United States, according to the bill. They also could score two points for every year they were employed lawfully in the United States and 10 more points for speaking and writing English fluently.

Merit-based visas would go first to applicants with the highest number of points.

"People are going to rack up a lot of points through education and employment," said Jen Smyers, associate director for immigration and refugee policy with humanitarian group Church World Service. "What does that mean for someone who needs their sibling to be here because they are facing trauma? What does it mean for a woman in Iran who does not have education opportunities?"

Church World Service, the AFL-CIO and other groups are urging senators not to reduce family reunification visas.

If enacted, the bill would align the United States with countries such as Canada and Australia that use a point system to attract skilled, educated workers.

The presidential administration of George W. Bush seized on the idea of using immigration as an economic policy tool. But it failed in 2007 to pass a broad immigration bill that would have provided a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants and would have shifted the bulk of future immigrants to a point system.

At the time, President Barack Obama, who was then a freshman senator, said it did not "reflect how much Americans value the family ties that bind people to their brothers and sisters or to their parents."

Obama has so far praised the Senate bill and has not taken a position on the merit-based system.

Tags : ,



The idea behind the text.
Respect for the truth is almost the basis of all morality.
Nothing can come from nothing.


Popular Topics


Well, the way they make shows is, they make one show. That show's called a pilot. Then they show that show to the people who make shows, and on the strength of that one show they decide if they're going to make more shows.

Like you, I used to think the world was this great place where everybody lived by the same standards I did, then some kid with a nail showed me I was living in his world, a world where chaos rules not order, a world where righteousness is not rewarded. That's Cesar's world, and if you're not willing to play by his rules, then you're gonna have to pay the price.

You think water moves fast? You should see ice. It moves like it has a mind. Like it knows it killed the world once and got a taste for murder. After the avalanche, it took us a week to climb out. Now, I don't know exactly when we turned on each other, but I know that seven of us survived the slide... and only five made it out. Now we took an oath, that I'm breaking now. We said we'd say it was the snow that killed the other two, but it wasn't. Nature is lethal but it doesn't hold a candle to man.

You see? It's curious. Ted did figure it out - time travel. And when we get back, we gonna tell everyone. How it's possible, how it's done, what the dangers are. But then why fifty years in the future when the spacecraft encounters a black hole does the computer call it an 'unknown entry event'? Why don't they know? If they don't know, that means we never told anyone. And if we never told anyone it means we never made it back. Hence we die down here. Just as a matter of deductive logic.