Friday, August 9, 2013

 

Russia won’t supply outstanding S-300s to Syria until mid-2014 - report

Fulfillment of Russia’s contract with Syria to supply S-300 air defense systems have been postponed until at least June 2014, a corporate report indicates. Moscow has been reluctant to deliver the weapons amid the unstable situation in the country.


A glimpse of light on the future of the contract, which caused controversy earlier this year, was shed by an annual report of MMZ Avangard. It’s part of the Almaz-Antey, the producer of the S-300, which is responsible for supplying missiles for the systems.

The report published on the company’s website mentions a letter from another branch of Almaz-Antey informing of a delay in the contract with a foreign customer 760. The code corresponds to Syria, reports the Russian newspaper Vedomosti.

The letter arrived on April 3 and said that Avangard should postpone delivery of the second batch of 48N6E2 missiles under the contract till June 2014. The report also says that the company received advanced payment of almost $7.3 million for the missiles.

Russia and Syria signed a $1 billion contract for four S-300 batteries back in 2011 before the tensions in the Middle-Eastern country escalated into a bloody war.

The contract came into media spotlight in May amid general Western criticism of Russia over supplying arms to the government of Bashar Assad. Some media implied that the systems are about to be deliver and would greatly empower Damascus in its fight against the rebel forces.

Moscow insists that it was not violating any international law with its defense contracts with Syria. Though in June, President Vladimir Putin announced that the S-300 contract is yet to be fulfilled. He reiterated Russia’s position that the systems are of no use against the rebels, but voiced concerns over the balance of military power in the region this supply may cause. The deal was not shelved, however, despite some media reports to the contrary.

The postponement of the shipment is most likely beneficial for both Russia and Syria in the current situation, believes military expert Ruslan Pukhov, because the systems delivered “would certainly be a very strong political irritant.”

S-300 air defense system

“The situation is similar with the Mig-29 jets,” he explained to RT. “Several months ago head of the MiG corporation Sergey Korotkov stated that the company, which is expected to supply four of the 12 MiGs contracted in 2007, but is ready to deliver six. I am almost certain that this delivery will also be postponed.”

“The political support that Syria gets from Russia, China and Iran is much more important and helps Assad more than, say 10 aircraft of several dozen missiles,” Pukhov said.

Russia’s military cooperation with Syria made it target of ill-placed criticism back on June 2012, when then-US State Secretary Hillary Clinton, who accused Moscow of supplying advanced combat helicopters to the Assad government, a move that would “escalate the conflict quite dramatically.”

The helicopters in question were later revealed to be three old Soviet-era aircraft, which Russia was returning to their owner after an overhaul.
Tags : , , , , ,

Share

Social

The idea behind the text.
Respect for the truth is almost the basis of all morality.
Nothing can come from nothing.



Follow

Popular Topics

Read

Well, the way they make shows is, they make one show. That show's called a pilot. Then they show that show to the people who make shows, and on the strength of that one show they decide if they're going to make more shows.

Like you, I used to think the world was this great place where everybody lived by the same standards I did, then some kid with a nail showed me I was living in his world, a world where chaos rules not order, a world where righteousness is not rewarded. That's Cesar's world, and if you're not willing to play by his rules, then you're gonna have to pay the price.

You think water moves fast? You should see ice. It moves like it has a mind. Like it knows it killed the world once and got a taste for murder. After the avalanche, it took us a week to climb out. Now, I don't know exactly when we turned on each other, but I know that seven of us survived the slide... and only five made it out. Now we took an oath, that I'm breaking now. We said we'd say it was the snow that killed the other two, but it wasn't. Nature is lethal but it doesn't hold a candle to man.

You see? It's curious. Ted did figure it out - time travel. And when we get back, we gonna tell everyone. How it's possible, how it's done, what the dangers are. But then why fifty years in the future when the spacecraft encounters a black hole does the computer call it an 'unknown entry event'? Why don't they know? If they don't know, that means we never told anyone. And if we never told anyone it means we never made it back. Hence we die down here. Just as a matter of deductive logic.