Thursday, September 19, 2013

 

EPA expected to tighten curbs on new power plant pollution

WASHINGTON - The Obama administration will unveil on Friday new regulations expected to set strict limits on the amount of carbon pollution generated by any new U.S. power plants, and which is certain to face legal challenges and a backlash from congressional supporters of the coal industry.


The American Electric Power Company's cooling tower at their Mountaineer plant is shown in New Haven, West Virginia October 27, 2009. REUTERS/Ayesha RascoeThe Environmental Protection Agency's long-awaited guidelines are expected to make it more difficult for new coal-fired power plants to be built.

The rules, which are a revision of a previous attempt by the EPA to create emissions standards for fossil fuel plants, are the first salvo in President Barack Obama's climate change package, announced in June.

EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy is expected to discuss the new rules and defend Obama's climate plan, which opponents in Congress say amounts to a "war on coal," during a speech at the National Press Club in Washington on Friday morning.

Any new coal plant built in the United States would need to install technology to capture its carbon emissions, according to sources familiar with the plan.

That technology is controversial because it is currently not yet operational on a commercial scale, an issue that could become central to legal challenges to the EPA.

The EPA previously issued a version of the rule last year but made changes to it to address potential legal weaknesses and to factor in over 2 million public comments.

Unlike last year's version, the new proposed rule would create separate emissions rates for coal and gas-fired power plants. Legal experts had warned that a single standard, which had been set at 1,000 lb of carbon dioxide per megawatt hour, deviated from the federal Clean Air Act.

The new version would let new coal plants emit up to 1,100 lb of CO2/MWh, according to sources who have viewed the proposal, slightly higher than the 1,000 lb rate in the previous proposal.

A new coal plant could also be built at the current average emissions rate, around 1,800 lb/MWh, but the plant owners would have seven years to bring down its emissions rate to between 1,000 and 1,050 lb/MWh, according to sources who have seen the rule.

This provision is a significant change from the first version, which gave a coal plant 30 years to achieve a 1,000 lb/MWh emissions performance rate.

Under the new rules, newly built large natural gas-fired power plants could emit up to 1,000 lb of carbon dioxide per megawatt hour. Smaller, less efficient natural gas-fired plants could emit up to 1,100 lb of CO2/MWh or less, sources said.

Obama had set a September 20 deadline for the EPA to issue the proposal. The agency will launch a public comment period after the rule's release.

It is due to issue a proposal to address emissions from existing power plants - which account for nearly 40 percent of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions - by June 2014.
Tags : , ,

Share

Social

The idea behind the text.
Respect for the truth is almost the basis of all morality.
Nothing can come from nothing.



Follow

Popular Topics

Read

Well, the way they make shows is, they make one show. That show's called a pilot. Then they show that show to the people who make shows, and on the strength of that one show they decide if they're going to make more shows.

Like you, I used to think the world was this great place where everybody lived by the same standards I did, then some kid with a nail showed me I was living in his world, a world where chaos rules not order, a world where righteousness is not rewarded. That's Cesar's world, and if you're not willing to play by his rules, then you're gonna have to pay the price.

You think water moves fast? You should see ice. It moves like it has a mind. Like it knows it killed the world once and got a taste for murder. After the avalanche, it took us a week to climb out. Now, I don't know exactly when we turned on each other, but I know that seven of us survived the slide... and only five made it out. Now we took an oath, that I'm breaking now. We said we'd say it was the snow that killed the other two, but it wasn't. Nature is lethal but it doesn't hold a candle to man.

You see? It's curious. Ted did figure it out - time travel. And when we get back, we gonna tell everyone. How it's possible, how it's done, what the dangers are. But then why fifty years in the future when the spacecraft encounters a black hole does the computer call it an 'unknown entry event'? Why don't they know? If they don't know, that means we never told anyone. And if we never told anyone it means we never made it back. Hence we die down here. Just as a matter of deductive logic.